Intelligent Design, the best explanation of Origins

This is my personal virtual library, where i collect information, which leads in my view to Intelligent Design as the best explanation of the origin of the physical Universe, life, and biodiversity


You are not connected. Please login or register

Intelligent Design, the best explanation of Origins » Theory of evolution »  Macroevolution. Fact, or fantasy ?

Macroevolution. Fact, or fantasy ?

Go to page : Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Go down  Message [Page 2 of 2]

26 Re: Macroevolution. Fact, or fantasy ? on Tue 10 Oct 2017 - 15:53

Admin


Admin
Embracing Uncertainty in Reconstructing Early Animal Evolution

http://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(17)31092-8

The origin of animals, one of the major transitions in evolution, remains mysterious.

Reconstruction of ancient evolutionary radiations is devilishly difficult and will likely require broader sampling of sponge and ctenophore genomes, improved analytical strategies and critical analyses of the phylogenetic distribution and molecular mechanisms underlying apparently conserved traits.

our window through time to the Urmetazoan remains obscured by uncertainty regarding whether sponges or ctenophores are the sister lineage to all other animals. While we concur with the sentiment in the opening quote that “we're not afraid to admit what we don't know” and we revel in the insights that are currently possible regarding the dawn of animal life, we eagerly anticipate future breakthroughs that will allow us to move from ignorance to knowledge in our quest to reconstruct the origin of animals.

But hey, maybe mainstream scientists will wake up one day to the unconvenient truth, that the foundations lied by Hume et al in the 19th century, that design inference should be excluded a priory by scientific investigation, ( specially when it comes to the quest of historical sciences, and origins ) was a huge mistake, and that the hypothesis of a powerful intelligent cause is valid of consideration, and most probably explains best the origin of animals and biodiversity.

‘‘Science works on the frontier between knowledge and
ignorance. We’re not afraid to admit what we don’t
know. There’s no shame in that. The only shame is to
pretend that we have all the answers.’’
—Neil deGrasse Tyson, Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey

But he is afraid to replace the " i don't know" with " most probably, an intelligent designer " - go figure, why.

Macroevolution. Fact, or fantasy?
http://reasonandscience.heavenforum.org/t1390-macroevolution#1982

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15612191
In the last 25 years, criticism of most theories advanced by Darwin and the neo-Darwinians has increased considerably, and so did their defense. Darwinism has become an ideology, while the most significant theories of Darwin were proven unsupportable.

But up to that breakthrough recognisance, evolution remains an undisputed and unquestioned fact - how fool.

View user profile http://elshamah.heavenforum.com

View previous topic View next topic Back to top  Message [Page 2 of 2]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum